Monday, May 23, 2011
(a) "voltage" is proportional to "current";
(b) for fixed "voltage", the "current" is proportional to the cross-sectional area of the wire and inversely proportional to its length.
As a voltage source we can use batteries. Ohm first used "chemical batteries" but those had very short life-time, i.e their electromotive force (EMF) varied during the experiment. Eventually, he used a thermocouple as a voltage source. The voltage, or more correctly the EMF, was therefore N*E where N is the number of batteries connected in series and E is EMF of a single battery. If the resistance of wire was X, and internal resistance of the battery was r, then the current I was given by
Current can be measured by placing a magnetized needle hanging on a string at certain fixed distance from the wire. Since we are not supposed to know exactly the angular dependence of the magnetic force, we will simply for each current twist the string on which the needle hangs until the needle returns in its position before the current began flowing. The angle by which the string was twisted is proportional to the force momentum, and thus measures the strength of the current. (Of course we assume that forces are indeed proportional to the current.)
We will begin the experiment by keeping the same wire (the same X) and changing N. By plotting 1/I versus 1/N, we will establish r/E, and will establish the "voltage-current" relation of the Ohm's law. Now, by lengthening the wire of making its cross section larger we can investigate dependence of resistance on geometry of the wire. (Of course we cannot measure the actual absolute values of the resistance, but all we need is the dependence on length and cross section area...) Ohm published his results on geometry dependence of X in Journal fur Chemie und Physik, 46, p. 160 (1826).
Nice short description of Ohm's work in its historic context can be found in the book History of Physics (Storia della Fisica) by Mario Gliozzi.
Comment: Groshaus suggested to measure the voltage by attaching one of the leads of the battery to electroscope. Can it be done with sufficient accuracy?
HOW TO READ PROPAGATION NUMBERS
The A index [ LOW is GOOD ]
- 1 to 6 is BEST
- 7 to 9 is OK
- 11 or more is BAD
Represents the overall geomagnetic condition of the ionosphere ("Ap" if averaged from the Kp-Index) (an average of the eight 3-hour K-Indices) ('A' referring to amplitude) over a given 24 hour period, ranging (linearly) typically from 1-100 but theoretically up to 400.
A lower A-Index generally suggests better propagation on the 10, 12, 15, 17, & 20 Meter Bands; a low & steady Ap-Index generally suggest good propagation on the 30, 40, 60, 80, & 160 Meter Bands.
SFI index [ HIGH is GOOD ]
- 70 NOT GOOD
- 80 GOOD
- 90 BETTER
- 100+ BEST
The measure of total radio emissions from the sun at 10.7cm (2800 MHz), on a scale of 60 (no sunspots) to 300, generally corresponding to the sunspot level, but being too low in energy to cause ionization, not related to the ionization level of the Ionosphere.
Higher Solar Flux generally suggests better propagation on the 10, 12, 15, 17, & 20 Meter Bands; Solar Flux rarely affects the 30, 40, 60, 80, & 160 Meter Bands.
K index [ LOW is GOOD ]
- 0 or 1 is BEST
- 2 is OK
- 3 or more is BAD
- 5 is VERY VERY BAD
The overall geomagnetic condition of the ionosphere ("Kp" if averaged over the planet) over the past 3 hours, measured by 13 magnetometers between 46 & 63 degrees of latitude, and ranging quasi-logarithmically from 0-9. Designed to detect solar particle radiation by its magnetic effect. A higher K-index generally means worse HF conditions.
A lower K-Index generally suggests better propagation on the 10, 12, 15, 17, & 20 Meter Bands; a low & steady Kp-Index generally suggest good propagation on the 30, 40, 60, 80, & 160 Meter Bands.
Terms of Service
I am not responsible for any thing that happens to your mental health, computer and all personal property because you visited my site.
This site is a collection of some things sent to me by e-mail, obtained from other blogs and the internet. If there is a picture or quote that is copyrighted to you let me know and I will remove your item .
Thoughts expressed in my blog are just that . I give My Opinion on the many events, products and how too, reported by the media and other web-sites.
Do not use this blog site to obtain weather events or disasters information. What I post may not be correct. Always get information from the proper media, weather (NWS)(NOAA)
Pacific Tsunami Warning Center and USGS sites